n

Saturday, December 02, 2006

messages

its always so hard to interpret things that are written arnt they?

there are the one liners - the simply brief questions that really are just that. but yet can still be open to interpretation. what, for example is the motivation behind the Q? just a general friendly concern, a token gesture, something that is done regularly by said person, or more?

is the message a cleverly crafted one - like the one that i returned? not wanting to say nothing (how can i pass a chance?) but not wanting to launch into anything. not wanting to give away too much, but want to provide enough to elicit a response. to be witty and clever and most of all careful. and what of the recipient - what goes through the mind of the recipient of my carefully designed master piece?

and the most puzzling reply. probably nothing, but could mean so much to me. i could spend hours thinking about it... reading and re-reading the words. hoping there is more, but knowing there is not. the open possibility and impossibilities of messages.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home